I remember the coverage of Hurricane Katrina very clearly. I
woke up and immediately went to watch the news, and Katrina was just coming in.
We knew it would cause a lot of damage, but I don’t think anyone knew that it
would cause quite as much as it did. In the weeks afterward, the costliest
natural disaster in American history dominated the headlines.
I have a special reminder of Katrina every year: The
hurricane made landfall in New Orleans on my birthday. This connection makes me
think of the power of hurricanes annually- and they always fascinate me.
We like to think that we’re above the power of nature. We’ve
climbed to the top of the world, and explored the depths of the sea. We’ve
built buildings that are ridiculously high- it’s almost like we’re mocking
nature, pretending to be invulnerable. And then, something like Katrina
happens, be it a hurricane, earthquake, tsunami, anything; and it sends us
crashing- sometimes literally- back to earth.
This year, I had another reason
to think of hurricanes. On my birthday this
year, another hurricane- Hurricane Isaac- made landfall in New Orleans.
Thankfully, the damage caused by Isaac was nowhere close to the damage caused
by Katrina; however, it was a reminder: at any time, there could be another
hurricane just as strong as Katrina. So is there a way to predict when the next
“big one” will hit?
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
The attribute that makes natural disasters so powerful is
their unpredictability. Volcanoes may give a few weeks’ at max. Hurricanes form
and make landfall within a couple of days. We’ve vastly improved our tornado
warning system; now we have nearly fifteen minutes of notice! And earthquakes-
well, good luck. The 2005 hurricane season was especially unpredictable- we’ll
get to that in a little bit. But the variability of hurricanes is what makes
predicting the next powerful one especially difficult.
I could use all Atlantic hurricanes as my data set for this
project, but I have neither the time nor the patience for that. Instead, I’m
looking at only hurricanes who have been powerful enough to have their names
retired:
There have been 77 retired names since 1954. One, Gracie (1959), is listed as retired by some sources but not others. Another, Allison (2001), was retired despite never actually becoming a hurricane. |
There are a lot of extremely strong hurricanes in this set,
but there’s still a very large number (there’s even a tropical storm!). I’m going to narrow it down even further, to
hurricanes that caused most of their damage to the United States. This
eliminates hurricanes like Mitch in 1998, but I’m investigating when the next
big hurricane will hit the U.S., not the rest of the Atlantic.
Now we can begin looking for trends. Hurricanes overall
appear to be getting stronger and it looks like there are more that have been
retired in recent years, but…
R2 =0.07818 |
That’s not a very conclusive regression line, and
logarithmic or exponential lines don’t really fit either. While the numbers
from 2003-2005 are eye-catching (12 hurricane names retired in three years!),
2006 and 2009 did not have any hurricanes retired, and neither hurricane on
that graph from 2010 made landfall in the U.S..
On the other hand, there has been a small increase in total
named storms over the years:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/timeline/61b5be0856ccb449ab4978b2909ae8d7.png |
There might be a bit of a cycle going on- in recent years, a
two to four year cycle of powerful hurricane seasons appears. 2008 had several
strong hurricanes three years after 2005, and 2009 had none after the weak 2006
season. But as we look back (and forward- just Irene in 2011), we can see that
this theory doesn’t hold.
How about ENSO? We covered this phenomenon in depth a few months back, and it would make sense. El Nino supposedly represses hurricane
growth, and our data supports that. Unusually strong El Nino effects match up
with unusually weak hurricane season.
The reverse of El Nino, La Nina, would then spur hurricane growth,
right? Not so fast- the data on hurricane seasons that correspond with La Nina
doesn’t provide a strong correlation either way.
The key to this problem would appear to be the 2005
hurricane season. It was unusual in many ways. By all measures, it was the
strongest hurricane season ever. Hurricane Emily was the earliest category 5
storm ever. Vince formed father northeast (into cooler waters) than any other
storm on record. Wilma strengthened ridiculously fast after its formation.
Hurricane Epsilon was the latest hurricanes ever, lasting deep into December.
Tropical Storm Zeta went all the way into January. And yes; those are Greek
letters, meaning that the 21 letters from the English alphabet were exhausted-
the only time this has ever happened. In all, the 2005 season produced 31
tropical depressions, 27 named storms, and 15 hurricanes (7 of category 3 or
above). It accounted for 3,913 deaths and over $150 billion of damage.
I can find just two unusual aspects concerning the climate
in 2005. The first is that El Nino was expected to develop, but didn’t. The
second is that the years leading up to it- 2002-2005- were four of the five
warmest years on record (at the time). Fourteen hurricane names were retired
for these four years, and the one other year in the top five was 1998, which
saw the wraths of Hurricanes Mitch and Georges. Did the heat finally reach a
climax in 2005, causing the extreme hurricane season? Maybe, but more likely
not. In the Pacific, 2005 was an average or below average year. (It should be
noted that 2006 was the most active Pacific season since 2000, however.)
Additionally, many of the years since 2005 have been warmer, and yet none of
them had hurricane seasons quite as strong.
Overall, I just can’t find a trend for powerful storm
season. Hurricanes are simply so unpredictable that a storm season predicted to
be “slightly above-average” can produce 28 named storms; the opposite can be
true as well. We don’t know when, specifically, in a season the next big
hurricane will hit, or even what year it will be.* We can make guesses, but
nature will laugh at us and prove us wrong anyway. The best we can do is
prepare for the worst and try to minimize the damage and loss of life.
*In 2011, Colorado State University, one of the leading
hurricane prediction centers, announced that it would no longer be releasing
quantitative forecasts six months prior to each season, as "...forecasts of the last 20 years
have not shown real-time forecast skill." Hurricanes are unpredictable
even for the professionals from a long distance away.
No comments:
Post a Comment